Operational library
64 in-depth playbooks for TAT, quality, LGPD, PACS and RIS, deployment, management, procurement and responsible clinical AI.
Open the library →RESOURCES
The library of people who report
Operational playbooks, classifications, templates, glossary, practical guides, integrations and open science. Real reference material, not a brochure.
O laudo depois da IA (in Portuguese)
Free 43-page e-book, in Portuguese, on the AI-drafted report, report authorship and CFM Resolution 2.454/2026, with an implementation checklist.
Get the e-book →Classifications
The systems that organize radiological decision-making (BI-RADS, LI-RADS, PI-RADS, TI-RADS and others), with the role of each one and how the RadCommons corpus versions and cites them.
Explore →Report templates
Templates by modality and by exam, in the standard your institution controls, with governance, versioning and automatic application by LaudAI.
Explore →Glossary
Radiology, AI and compliance terms explained without sales jargon: from TAT to meaningful human supervision.
Explore →Guides
Deploying assistive AI, template governance, critical-finding protocol and operational metrics, in straight-to-the-point guides.
Explore →Integrations
PACS, RIS and worklist: how context comes in without manual upload and how the signed report goes back to your system.
Explore →Documentation
The technical reference for the RadCommons platform and API, for the team that will integrate and evaluate.
Explore →Blog
Referenced technical articles on evidence, compliance, operations and product. Written by people who report.
Read the blog →RadCommons
The citable, versioned decision corpus that underpins GUIDE, with 121 structured classification systems served via API.
Explore the corpus →LaiBench
The public, blind benchmark that measures quality case by case, without hiding failures behind an aggregate average.
See how we measure →Case studies
How radiologists, clinics, hospitals and teleradiology operations apply the post-imaging layer in their routine.
Explore cases →How to choose AI reporting software
A practical criterion for comparing integration, medical authorship, auditing, data in Brazil and public measurement.
Open the comparison →The library in numbers
- PLAYBOOKS64 operational guides across eight critical fronts
- CLASSIFICATIONS121 systems versioned and cited in RadCommons
- ARTICLES19 referenced technical articles on the blog
- TEMPLATESCoverage by modality: CT, MRI, US, X-ray, mammography and more
- GLOSSARYRadiology, AI and regulatory terms explained without jargon
A library for making decisions, not a brochure
Each section of this center exists to answer a real question from those who report or those who buy: which criterion is in force, how to structure the report for that exam, what a term means, how to deploy without stalling the routine, how the systems connect. The material cites a source when there is one and says when it is the opinion of those who operate.
RadCommons publishes sources and versions. LaiBench v3.10 records fidelity on 120 internal cases and is not external clinical validation. Operational metrics state their window, sample and limitations.
A reading path for each decision
Choose by the problem you need to solve
Anyone defining a classification starts with RadCommons and the official sources. Anyone structuring the routine starts with the templates and guides. Anyone evaluating an institutional purchase moves on to integration, security, deployment and methodology. LaiBench documents a controlled internal fidelity benchmark.
The library does not replace clinical validation or the institution's documentation. It organizes references, examples and criteria so the conversation starts at a better level. When there is a guideline, version or source, the content should point to it; when there is only operational practice, the text should say that it is workflow guidance.
How the content stays useful
Classifications and terms change, so usefulness depends on version, source and review date. Templates and guides also need to separate the editorial example from the institution's clinical decision. The library's policy is to make that origin visible and to link the material to the product without turning an educational page into a diagnosis or an imposed protocol.
NEXT STEP
See Laudos.AI in your workflow
Live demo with your exam types and your institution's template, right in the product.
Before you choose software
Compare features, check terms and use the trial plan in your reporting workflow.