DEPLOYMENT

Live in weeks,
not months

Clinical software usually arrives with a deployment project bigger than the product: consulting billed separately, integration that never ends and a go-live that keeps slipping. Our design is the opposite: your team and ours, three phases, up to 2 weeks, without replacing your PACS or your RIS.

DEPLOYMENT

Three phases, two weeks, zero system replacement

Deploying clinical software shouldn't turn into a year-long project. Your team and ours move forward in real routine, with PACS and RIS staying where they are.

  1. 01
    PHASE 1 · WEEK 0

    Foundation

    Demo in your context, with your exam types and your institution's template. We map the current workflow (RIS, PACS, worklist) and deliver the security documentation for IT and the DPO to assess in parallel, not at the end.

    Demo with your real exams
    Map of your workflow and systems
    Documentation for IT and DPO on day one
  2. 02
    PHASE 2 · WEEK 1

    Configuration

    Your institution's templates go into the platform with your terminology and your shortcuts. The critical finding protocol gets levels and an SLA, and the integration runs in parallel, without touching the live operation.

    Your institution's templates and terminology
    Critical-finding protocol with a defined SLA
    RIS/PACS integration in parallel
  3. 03
    PHASE 3 · WEEK 2

    Validation

    Pilot in real routine, with your own radiologists and a criterion agreed in writing before starting: TAT, adoption and quality. The go-live comes from the pilot's numbers, not the vendor's promise.

    Pilot in real routine, not in a demo
    Criterion agreed in writing
    Go-live decided by data
IN DETAIL

What your team won't need to do

The lean deployment is not a salesperson's promise: it follows from the layer not replacing your systems.

Deployment fact sheet

  • DEADLINEUp to 2 weeks from demo to go-live, with a pilot in real routine
  • TEAMYour team and ours: product, clinical and integration, no third parties
  • INFRANo replacement of PACS, RIS or viewer
  • SECURITYDocumentation for IT and DPO delivered on day one
  • TEMPLATESYour institution's own, structured together with the clinical lead
  • DECISIONGo-live with the pilot's numbers on the table, criterion agreed in writing

Why it can be fast without being rushed

Deployment is short because the scope is honest: Laudos.AI does not replace your RIS or your PACS, so there is no database migration, no big bang and no operation brought to a halt. What gets deployed is a layer over the workflow that already exists, and a layer is validated in real routine, not in a meeting room.

The pilot is the centerpiece. Your own radiologists, real exams and a criterion agreed before starting: TAT, adoption and quality. If the number doesn't show up, the decision is not to proceed, and that possibility is in the design from day one.

The role of your IT team and your DPO

IT and the DPO come in at week zero, not at the end. The documentation on architecture, encryption, subprocessors and data flow arrives before the first technical meeting, and the integration is designed together with the people who run your systems.

While the technical assessment runs, the pilot is already producing data with the Agent operating in the web RIS interface, without waiting for an API project. The two tracks meet at go-live.

FAQ

Questions from people who have deployed clinical software before

Is two weeks serious, or a salesperson's timeline?

It is the standard design, and it depends on two things: the pilot radiologists' schedules and IT's availability for the integration. When either one gets tight, the schedule is renegotiated in writing, not quietly pushed back.

What if our IT team doesn't have the bandwidth right now?

The pilot doesn't depend on it: the Agent operates in the web RIS interface within minutes. Integration via HL7/DICOM comes later, at your institution's pace, without blocking the pilot's value.

Who trains the team?

The Laudos.AI team, including physicians, directly with the pilot radiologists. The typical curve is one shift to calibrate template and shortcuts; people who report teach people who report.

What happens if the pilot fails?

Operations continue as they were, with no exit cost. The pilot exists precisely so that this answer is possible: the decision to proceed is made with numbers, not with a commitment made before the evidence.

Book the deployment conversation Integrations in detail Security for IT and DPO Volume pricing

What falls to each team

Who is responsible for each stage

Clinical leadership defines templates, owners and the critical finding protocol. IT validates identity, connectivity and the path between RIS, PACS and report. The DPO assesses data flow and documentation. Laudos.AI runs configuration, integration, training and pilot follow-up. Naming these owners at week zero keeps a governance gap from showing up disguised as a technical problem at go-live.

The criterion for moving forward should be written down before the pilot: which modalities are included, which sample will be observed, how to measure adoption, time and quality, and who decides. If a requirement fails, operations keep the previous workflow while the adjustment is made. A short deployment is only safe when there is an equally clear rollback route.

The work continues after the cutover

The first production shifts need close follow-up to correct template, vocabulary and integration exceptions. After that window, support moves on to tracking incidents, RIS or PACS changes and new template versions. Go-live is the start of governed use, not the end of the project.

NEXT STEP

Start with the demo in your context

Your exam types, your institution's template and the tough questions from IT and the DPO. Deployment starts at the first conversation.

Request a demo Security and compliance

Content updated on .