Radiology report editor
What a clinical editor needs to offer for context, review, voice, structure and signature.
Open guide →RESOURCES · GUIDES
Practice, not theory
Short guides for those who actually run radiology: deployment, governance, critical-finding protocol and the metrics that matter.
- DEPLOYMENTAssistive AI without stalling the routine
The lowest-friction path: a demo in context, a pilot with the team in real routine and assisted integration with IT. What to measure in the pilot and how to decide with data, not with a demo.
Start with the demo → - GOVERNANCETemplates with an owner
How to version, approve and audit the house template so standardization survives the shift: roles, change workflow and the audit trail that accreditation requires.
Read the full guide → - PROTOCOLAuditable critical finding
From the screenshot in the group chat to a protocol with SLA: criticality levels, channels, escalation and the closed-loop record that supports an audit.
Read the full guide → - 1FOUNDATION · WK. 02CONFIGURATION · WK. 13VALIDATION · WK. 2OPERATIONSThe manager's metrics
TAT by queue, output per radiologist, backlog and critical-finding SLA in real time: the seven metrics worth a dashboard and how to act on each one.
Read the full guide → - QUALITYMoving to structured reporting
What the evidence shows about structure and completeness, and the migration route by modality that does not stall production.
Read the full guide → - DATAData residency and LGPD in practice
Where reports and audio should live, what to ask the vendor and how the DPO assesses risk in a clinical tool.
Read the full guide →
OVERVIEW
Complete radiology reporting guides
Choose the topic and move on to a dedicated guide, with practical criteria for deployment and clinical use.
AI for radiology reports
How to evaluate AI applied to reporting without confusing production assistance with autonomous diagnosis.
Open guide →Structured radiology report
How to structure without making it rigid, improve completeness and preserve the radiologist's judgment.
Open guide →Radiology reporting setup
Workstation, microphone, PACS, shortcuts and ergonomics to reduce friction during the shift.
Open guide →System for radiology clinics
Operation, integration, governance and traceability criteria for choosing a platform.
Open guide →Radiology reporting software
What to compare beyond transcription: context, structure, auditing and the path to signature.
Open guide →Voice software for reporting
Why speech recognition solves only part of the workflow and how to measure the real gain.
Open guide →Automating medical reports
What can be automated in the report, what CFM 2.454/2026 keeps human and how to evaluate before contracting.
Learn more →Converting images into reports
What this search actually finds: detection, speech-to-report and integration via HL7, FHIR and DICOM-SR.
Learn more →The deployment guide, summarized
Guided deployment in up to 2 weeks, without replacing your PACS/RIS.
- WEEK 0Demo in your context: your exams, your template, your IT and DPO questions
- WEEKS 1 AND 2Pilot in real routine with your own radiologists and the agreed criterion (TAT, adoption, quality)
- DECISIONWith the pilot's numbers on the table, not a vendor's promise
- INTEGRATIONPACS, RIS and worklist connected with IT, in parallel, without disrupting operations
- GOVERNANCEVersioned templates, critical-finding protocol configured and manager dashboard switched on
How to use these guides
Each guide resolves a real decision: whether to adopt, how to govern, what to measure. They cite the evidence when it exists and say when it is the opinion of those who operate. If your question isn't covered, write to us and we'll point the way or write the missing guide.
How to use the guides without treating content as protocol
A good guide ends in a verifiable action
A software guide has to help configure, test or decide; a clinical guide has to point to the source, the scope and the limit. That is why the tracks in this section link each topic to the next step: preparing a template, comparing a workflow, reviewing a classification or putting together questions for IT and the DPO.
Update date, authorship and review matter. When a page summarizes a guideline, the source should prevail over the summary. When it describes an institutional process, the reality of the RIS, the PACS and local governance prevails over the example. The content shortens the path to the decision, but does not outsource the decision.
NEXT STEP
Would you rather see the guides applied to your case?
Live demo with your exam types and your institution's template, right in the product.
Questions and answers
How many items does this guides section have?
There are 9 pages published in this section, and each one opens directly, with no sign-up and no paywall. All sections
What is this guides section for?
To bring together the long-form guides on the editor, workflow and adoption, for those who need to decide and implement. Who publishes
Is the content reviewed by a physician?
Yes. Editorial responsibility lies with a radiologist registered with CRM-SP, and each page shows the date the content last changed. Who signs
Does this replace clinical assessment?
No. The material supports the decision of whoever writes the report. The finding, the clinical correlation and the management remain with whoever signs the exam. Clinical governance
Before you choose software
Compare features, check terms and use the trial plan in your reporting workflow.