Scale and standardization at a distance, without giving up quality
Laudos.AI organizes the context before the first click, applies the right template for each client and keeps critical findings under auditable escalation, even with the on-call radiologist miles away from the PACS.
History, clinical indication and comparisons organized before the first click.
Each client receives the report in its own standard, with no manual rework.
A serious finding escalates with SLA and audit trail, even at a distance.
Volume and time per radiologist and per queue, with reliable numbers.
Audio, transcription, draft, final report, logs and backups have distinct lifecycles, defined by the feature and the contracted configuration.
Reporting remotely means operating under two pressures at once: the worklist volume keeps growing and each client expects the report in its own standard, within the agreed SLA. Anyone who does teleradiology knows that quality and scale are not opposites, but keeping them together, shift after shift, takes a routine that flows without friction.
Laudos.AI was designed to respect the pace of the remote on-call radiologist. Instead of one more screen to manage, it arrives with the exam context organized, the client's template already selected and the safety mechanisms running in the background. The radiologist stays in charge of every sentence; the AI only removes the repetitive work that sits between them and the finding.
What you gain
The context gets there before you
Clinical indication, patient data and prior exams appear consolidated as soon as the case opens. LaudAI already structures the report by modality, so the on-call radiologist starts dictating on a ready base instead of building everything from scratch for each study.
One template for each client, automatically
Teleradiology services serve dozens of clients, each with its own layout, standard phrases and classifications. The platform applies the right template according to the worklist source, and GUIDE suggests consistent classifications. Standardization no longer depends on the memory of whoever is on call at three in the morning.
Critical findings don't get lost in the distance
When a finding that requires urgent communication comes up, the CRIT module records it, triggers escalation with SLA and keeps the complete audit trail of who saw it, when and how it was communicated. Responsibility for serious cases is documented, even with a distributed team.
Productivity you can audit
Each report generates metrics per radiologist and per queue: volume, time to report and SLA compliance. The coordination team sees where the operation flows and where it gets congested, with data that supports fair conversations with the team and with clients.
- 01BEFORE
The queue arrives organized
The case opens with the context consolidated and the client's template already active. The radiologist does not waste time hunting for history or trying to remember each client's standard; they start reporting right away.
- 02DURING
Dictated, it becomes a structured report
With REPORT, the on-call radiologist's speech becomes a structured report that they review and adjust. If a critical finding appears, CRIT starts escalation without pulling the physician out of the flow. Control over the wording is always theirs.
- 03AFTER
Every report becomes reliable data
On signing, the report feeds the metrics per radiologist and per queue and closes the audit trail of critical cases. Management tracks SLA and output in real time, without side spreadsheets.
Context ready before the first click
The case arrives organized, with priority, modality, client and criticality ahead of the text.
In teleradiology, the radiologist opens cases from different sources all day long. When the worklist already shows modality, client, priority and criticality flags before the report, deciding what to open first no longer depends on manually reading each queue. The physician enters the exam with the context that matters in view, not hidden in tabs and parallel systems.
Priors and clinical information organized in the same place reduce the back-and-forth between screens. The post-imaging layer does not replace the PACS; it orders what already exists so that the read starts with history, indication and comparisons at hand. Less administrative time per case means more cases reported without artificial pressure on clinical judgment, which remains the physician's.
Modality, client, priority and criticality visible before opening the text.
Comparisons and history organized so the read starts informed.
The information that prompted the exam travels with the case instead of sitting in another system.
Time goes to reading, not to searching for scattered context.
Standardization across distributed radiologists
Many physicians and many clients served with a common report standard, without taking anyone's judgment away.
A distributed operation has dozens of radiologists reporting the same types of exam in different ways. LaudAI delivers a structured report by modality, with Technique, Analysis, Impression and, when applicable, Classification. The controlled vocabulary and the template give everyone the same backbone, so the client receives reports that look alike, regardless of who was on shift.
Standardizing the form is not standardizing the conclusion. The physician remains the author: reviews, edits and signs what the structure suggests. GUIDE supports established classifications (BI-RADS, LI-RADS, PI-RADS, TI-RADS, Lung-RADS) so that the same finding gets the same language across professionals. The variability that drops is in formatting and nomenclature, not in diagnostic judgment, which remains human.
This matters when the contract requires editorial consistency. A client who receives reports from several of your radiologists starts to see a single standard of form and language, which reduces rework, reading doubts and requests for clarification about what the report meant.
SLA by client and by modality
Each contract has its own deadline, and the operation needs to see and meet all of them at the same time.
Teleradiology serves clients with different SLAs: one hospital requires emergency CT within minutes, one clinic accepts elective mammography within hours. Without visibility, the queue becomes guesswork. With criticality and deadline at the front of the case, prioritization becomes objective, the radiologist knows what is at risk of missing its deadline and the coordination team tracks compliance by client and by modality.
The post-imaging layer organizes prioritization; it does not make clinical decisions. The physician is the one who judges the urgency of the finding. What the system does is make the SLA readable, flag what is close to the limit and keep the compliance history for accountability. Governance and visibility of the operation, not surveillance of the professional.
Each client and modality with its SLA visible in the queue.
What is close to missing its deadline shows up first, without making clinical decisions.
The coordination team sees SLA by client without a side spreadsheet.
The radiologist spends attention on what is urgent, not on sorting queues.
Night shifts, time zones and case distribution
Covering the overnight hours and the peaks with distributed cases and critical findings closed out even at a distance.
Volume does not respect business hours. The overnight hours concentrate urgent cases with fewer people on call, and the operation may be spread across different time zones. Distributing cases to available radiologists, with the worklist already prioritized, keeps the night shift sustainable without overloading whoever is scheduled during the hours of lowest coverage, when each extra case weighs more.
The critical finding is the sensitive point at three in the morning. CRIT works in a closed loop, in the spirit of the ACR's Actionable Reporting, with SLA and receipt confirmation through to closure. The physician records the finding that requires immediate communication and the loop only closes when there is confirmation, so nothing critical gets lost between shifts, time zones or handovers.
Auditing and accountability at a distance
A per-exam trail that shows who reported what and when, backing the account given to the client and the DPO.
Operating at a distance requires proving what was done. The per-exam audit trail records who reported, when and what they signed, with role-based access. When a client questions a case or the DPO needs to respond to a data subject, the answer is in the exam history, not in the memory of whoever was on call that night.
Compliance depends on the concrete flow. There is a designated DPO and role-based access controls. Regions, subprocessors, persistence, logs, retention and backups are documented per deployment; the institution validates its own responsibilities.
Who reported, when and what they signed, recorded per case.
Each role sees what it is entitled to, nothing more.
Regions, subprocessors, persistence, logs, retention and backups described per deployment.
The exam history supports data subject requests and client inquiries.
CFM 2.454/2026 compliance and the teleradiology context
AI structures and suggests; the physician reviews, edits and signs, with meaningful human supervision.
CFM Resolution 2.454/2026 calls for meaningful human supervision over AI in medicine, and that is exactly the assistive model here. The system structures the report and suggests language; the radiologist reviews, corrects and signs. AI does not issue diagnoses or replace the professional, and authorship remains the physician's. Nothing is released to the client without going through the signature of whoever is responsible for the report.
Teleradiology also has a framework in CFM Resolution 2.314/2022, which covers remote reporting. The post-imaging layer fits into this arrangement without changing its requirements: it supports report production, keeps responsibility with the radiologist and preserves the record of what was signed. Compliance is demonstrated with the trail and with the review and signature flow, not with marketing promises.
How to evaluate and scale safely
Start with one client, measure in a real routine and grow without swapping out what already works.
Evaluating is not believing a slide. The 30-day pilot runs in a real routine, with real volume, so that the numbers show up in your operation, not in a vendor benchmark. ROI is calculated with your volume, and the production reference (median of 52 s from editor to signature, 54.6% of reports in under a minute) serves as a guidepost, not a promise.
Integration respects what is already running. HL7 v2, FHIR R4, DICOM-SR and DICOM MWL (C-FIND) connect PACS, RIS and worklist without replacing them. A dedicated engineer follows along, and the test environment uses synthetic or anonymized data before touching production. Starting with one client reduces risk, and the standard validated there is replicated to the other contracts predictably.
30 days with real volume, measured in your operation.
HL7 v2, FHIR R4, DICOM-SR and MWL integrate what already exists.
Synthetic or anonymized data before touching production.
Validate the standard on one contract and replicate it predictably.
Teleradiology needs to validate the standard per client, connectors, queue, access, contingency and indicators before expanding the flow.
Different roles,
explicit controls.
Illustrative scenarios, not testimonials or observed results.
The physician provides the findings and keeps full control over review, editing, validation and signature.
The resident checks each suggestion against the image and the criteria; the preceptor defines supervision and limits.
The institution validates template, permissions, integration, data, contingency and metrics before production.
Honest questions
Will the AI report in place of my radiologist?
No. Laudos.AI is assistive: it organizes the context, suggests the structure and takes care of traceability, but every sentence of the report is written and signed by the physician. This is aligned with CFM regulations, which require meaningful human supervision over the use of AI in diagnosis. The tool amplifies the remote on-call radiologist; it does not replace them.
We serve many clients with different standards. Doesn't that turn into a mess?
That is exactly the problem the platform solves. The template is applied according to the source of each exam in the worklist, so each client's standard is respected automatically, without relying on manual configuration for every case. Standardization belongs to the operation, not to individual memory.
With a distributed team, how do I ensure traceability and data compliance?
CRIT is in a controlled pilot. Communication and audit events depend on the module and the deployment. Regions, subprocessors, processing, persistence, logs, retention and backups are documented; some subprocessors may process data outside Brazil.
Does it integrate with the PACS and worklist of multiple clients?
It depends on each source. API, HL7, DICOM and Agent are distinct paths. System, version, events, fields, identity, return and contingency need validation; there is no promise of universal compatibility.
How does data residency work per contract?
The contract identifies roles, purpose, regions, subprocessors, access, persistence, logs, retention, backups and termination. There is a designated DPO, but the institution and each client need to validate the applicable flow.
Does it prioritize urgent cases automatically?
The system makes SLA and criticality visible in the worklist and flags what is close to missing its deadline, which supports objective prioritization. The one who decides clinical urgency is always the radiologist. The layer gives the queue visibility and order; it does not replace medical judgment.
What about critical findings in the middle of the night?
The CRIT module works in a closed loop, in the spirit of the ACR's Actionable Reporting, with SLA and receipt confirmation. The finding that requires immediate communication is recorded by the physician and the loop only closes with confirmation. That way nothing critical gets lost between shifts or time zones, including overnight.
Does it standardize without boxing the physician in?
Yes. The template and the controlled vocabulary provide a common structure (Technique, Analysis, Impression and, when applicable, Classification), and GUIDE supports classifications such as BI-RADS and LI-RADS. This standardizes form and nomenclature, not the conclusion. The physician reviews, edits and signs, remaining the author of the report.
How long does deployment take?
The standard evaluation is a 30-day pilot in a real routine, starting with one client. Before touching production there is a test environment with synthetic or anonymized data, and a dedicated engineer follows the integration. Once the first contract is validated, the standard is replicated to the others.
Schedule a conversation to understand how ready context, per-client templates and auditable critical findings fit into your queues and SLAs, at the pace of your remote on-call radiologists.
